Evidence-first tribunal
Multiple agents can review the same files, checks, patch lines, policy gates, and local git output. Consensus raises confidence; execution still requires explicit CLI flags.
Upstream maintainers get PR and CI tribunals. Downstream maintainers get merge or rebase evidence, agent handoff packages, and gated sync branches.
Multiple agents can review the same files, checks, patch lines, policy gates, and local git output. Consensus raises confidence; execution still requires explicit CLI flags.
Review pull requests and CI logs with deterministic checks, policy as code, API models, local AI CLIs, or a multi-agent tribunal.
Compare a fork with upstream, project merge conflicts, simulate rebase, ask multiple agents to choose a path, then run a gated sync branch through the CLI.
`sync` prints a plan first. `--execute`, `--push`, and `--create-pr` are separate gates, and pushes target the sync branch.
Review output flags blocked, behind, dirty, and unstable queue states before a maintainer spends review time.
PRs targeting non-default base branches get dependency review notes so stacked work is reviewed in the right order.
`ci-github` fetches failing GitHub Actions job logs and feeds them into the same rule-based, API, CLI, or tribunal reviewers.
`autofix-plan` prepares lockfile, snapshot, and formatter lanes with explicit verification commands.
Generate the manifest, wire the webhook, and use PR comments for review, CI, pause, resume, and autofix plans.
/argus help/argus review/argus ci/argus autofix/argus pause/argus resumehttps://your-host.example.com/api/github/webhook/api/github/app-manifestNo write scopes, no database, no token persistence.
Use owner/repo values or GitHub repository URLs.
Compares branches, open PRs, checks, and cleanup hints.
A real GitHub API integration suitable for iteration.
For upstream maintainers: review a normal GitHub pull request with baseline checks, then hand the same context to Codex, Claude, Gemini, or an API model.
Paste a PR URL, inspect the deterministic baseline, then optionally ask one agent or a tribunal for a structured review.
Runs local git in a private cache, checks merge-upstream and rebase-upstream evidence, then prepares agent-safe review material before any real sync branch is created.
Hosted demo cannot run local git. Clone the repository and run the app locally to use merge/rebase risk analysis.
Generate a scheduled workflow for downstream fork sync reports, merge-tree evidence, range-diff, and optional tracking issue comments. Use the CLI `sync` lane when the agent should create a real integration branch.
Export a prompt for merge or rebase preparation, inspect conflict evidence, or hand off the CLI sync path after agent review.
Run local merge/rebase analysis to generate conflict-specific agent instructions.
Local analysis adds git cherry and range-diff evidence here.
Enter an upstream repository and a fork repository. If the PR head fork differs from the branch you track for downstream sync, fill that in too. If GitHub API rate limits block the browser report, run local merge/rebase analysis directly.